arxiv:2609.20423
Published on Sep 17
· Submitted by
Hao Yu on Sep 18
· Tencent
Upvote
44
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
Document parsing converts document images into structured content and requires reliable performance across diverse layouts and acquisition conditions. Yet training corpora are biased toward common document types and clean digital pages, while expanding coverage alone does not specify how to address a parser's remaining weaknesses. We present WeVisDoc, a two-stage data-centric framework for robust end-to-end document parsing. Stage I broadens semantic, structural, and appearance coverage through heterogeneous data and structure-preserving degradation synthesis. Stage II uses a held-out probe to measure the Stage I parser's residual errors within fixed visual-structural clusters. These diagnostics guide targeted data construction and reallocation of the target-token budget. WeVisDoc-4B achieves an Overall score of 95.38 on OmniDocBench v1.6 and a mean Overall score of 75.54 across the three PureDocBench tracks, ranking first among the compared end-to-end parsers in all four settings. Compared with Stage I, Stage II improves Overall scores for the 2B and 4B models on both benchmarks, with larger gains on the degraded PureDocBench tracks, including a 4.03-point gain for the 4B model on the Real Degraded track.
View arXiv page View PDF Project pageGitHub 306 Add to collection
Community
Paper submitter 5 days ago
Document parsing converts document images into structured content and requires reliable performance across diverse layouts and acquisition conditions. Yet training corpora are biased toward common document types and clean digital pages, while expanding coverage alone does not specify how to address a parser's remaining weaknesses. We present WeVisDoc, a two-stage data-centric framework for robust end-to-end document parsing. Stage I broadens semantic, structural, and appearance coverage through heterogeneous data and structure-preserving degradation synthesis. Stage II uses a held-out probe to measure the Stage I parser's residual errors within fixed visual-structural clusters. These diagnostics guide targeted data construction and reallocation of the target-token budget. WeVisDoc-4B achieves an Overall score of 95.38 on OmniDocBench v1.6 and a mean Overall score of 75.54 across the three PureDocBench tracks, ranking first among the compared end-to-end parsers in all four settings. Compared with Stage I, Stage II improves Overall scores for the 2B and 4B models on both benchmarks, with larger gains on the degraded PureDocBench tracks, including a 4.03-point gain for the 4B model on the Real Degraded track.
4 days ago
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
-
FinixDoc: Rethinking Financial Document Parsing Beyond Saturated Benchmarks (2026)
-
Jina-OCR-v1: Efficient Document Parsing with Speculative Decoding and Dense Verifiable Rewards (2026)
-
From Diagnosis to Correction: Benchmarking and Improving Real-World Table Parsing (2026)
-
TeleOCR: Navigating Document Parsing Across Digital and Camera-Captured Documents (2026)
-
Identify, Locate, Link: End-to-End Key-Value Extraction from Document Images (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on HF Mirror checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here.
Tap or paste here to upload images
· Sign up or log in to comment
Upvote
44
Models citing this paper 2
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.20423 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.